According to the article, Seattle is now one of the handful of places looking to revive them as the issue of accommodating a growing population within the urban boundary comes to the forefront. A snippet from the article:
[...] "Like other mid-size cities that came of age in the first few decades of the 20th century, Seattle is made up largely of compact neighborhoods filled with single-family bungalows. Today, almost two-thirds of the city is zoned for single-family homes, so it’s harder for Seattle to accommodate its growing population -- the city swelled from 563,374 residents in 2000 to 608,660 last year -- without spreading farther and farther into the forests of the Pacific Northwest. That’s partly why the city saw backyard cottages as an attractive new alternative, a way to add affordable housing options without a wholesale redesign of the city’s signature neighborhoods."
Sounds like an idea worth looking into, imo. Increasing density at a suburban level, while also allowing for a more diverse mixture of income levels and age demographics to settle in a neighborhood, are the natural consequences that would come from this. Of course there will always be certain neighborhoods that would absolutely balk at the prospect of *gasp* renters moving into their hood. They certainly wont be having any of this, but that doesn't mean they should be listened to.